Oct 142015
 

Looking back over the course of the past week (both conferences and the two classes this week), I’ve noticed a few things. One such thing being that during conferences, students had no idea what to do, despite being told what would go on at their individual conference. I asked them to bring their papers to discuss with me any questions they had about their grades or my comments, as well as, be prepared to go over their progress in the class. Oh, they also were required to bring their midterm (I still don’t have everybody’s complete midterm). Most students showed up empty handed, unprepared, and midterm-less. Fast forwarding to this week, I’ve had students, more than usual, ask me what their Reading Response assignment was the night before it was due. I’ve noticed papers with fudged margins and spacing (usually together! not one or the other), and then one student asked me why they had to use Times New Roman font. The student wanted to know why they couldn’t use larger fonts. It was at this point today, through all of these circumstances, that I came to the conclusion that the students just don’t listen, and I have absolutely no idea how to make them listen short of yelling at them and being the instructor no one likes. Any suggestions in this department would be immensely beneficial because this past week brought my tolerance to the brink of spilling over. I’m not exactly sure how to dangle a shiny thing, so to speak, in front of their assignments and needed knowledge in order for them to pay attention, or at a minimum, listen.

 Posted by at 5:36 pm
Oct 142015
 

Looking back on midterm reflections, I can say that overall they were a success. It was a great chance for students who needed to discuss specific things on their papers with me to do so, since evidently getting a student to actually visit you during office hours is like having a root canal. However, what I did notice is that not many students actually came prepared with questions based on my comments left in the margins. After many students failed to take my comments and corrections on their rough drafts into consideration, I’ve begun circling errors, but not giving exact corrections for some things on their papers, especially if I know we spent a lot of time on it in class. Anticipating many questions regarding my non-specific comments, I was braced for an onslaught during one on one conferences. However, my hopes were crushed as students just sat across from me and passively listened to my explanations. What I got instead was the comment “I didn’t know we had to do that on every paper.” Rather than coming to see me to find out what went wrong in their paper, or discuss ways to improve, they choose to continue making the same mistakes, and I’m not sure why. I know this sounds rather pessimistic, and I would like to stress that this is not the case for every student. I’m just astounded at the differences between when I was sitting in freshmen comp as an undergrad myself, and the behavior of my current students. BLOWS MY MIND!

Oct 142015
 

We did conferences last week. I feel they went well overall. There were many students who showed up and acted like they didn’t care which was to be expected. I have found that many of my students have little interest in the class and in their performance in the class as a whole. One student in particular, who I have had some behavioral issues with, questioned a grade I gave him during our conference. I told him why he received the grade he did but he ended up walking out on the conference 40 seconds in.

I was thinking back to Freire and banking education. I wrote in a previous blog post that I had never thought of education as an oppressive thing. But now that I have had more time to think about it, I realized that I have had teachers and professors who were oppressors, similar to what Freire talked about in “The ‘Banking’ Concept of Education.” I remember my sophomore algebra teacher in high school. She was a ruthless dictator in the classroom. You could tell she thought of her students as just little children who knew nothing and that she held all the valuable knowledge in the world. Her class was a terrible experience.

 Posted by at 12:22 pm
Oct 092015
 

Mid-Term reflections went well. It was great to review the three essays all at once and see how each student has progressed. I guess the best part was really seeing that they had in fact progressed. Aside from improvements in format, pretty much everyone seems to be putting in some effort and coming up with more original theses, spending time thinking about the subject and even trying to put a new spin on their papers. I’m really happy overall.

In my colloquium section with Dr. Bradford, we’ve talked a lot about how what you discuss will be reflected in the papers, whereas the things you forget to mention will not magically appear. That certainly seems to be the case here. In the first essays I was really only looking for a thesis and some form of organization. That was the only thing I really got. After that I ramped it up a bit – asking for citation and quotation. They, for the most part, did it. I think that the third essays will be even better. I hope that everyone else is having a similarly positive experience.

 Posted by at 12:08 pm
scroll to top